Integrated MEL Modules – Analysis and Reporting of Monitoring and Evaluation Results, 17 December 2024

The European Movement in Albania (EMA), within the framework of the Integrated Modules for MEL – Monitoring and Evaluation of Rule of Law Policies, supported by the European Union as part of the project “Building Partnership on Fundamental Issues: Empowering CSOs for the EU Accession Process”, organized the next MEL module on December 17, 2024. This module focused on data collection, analysis, processing, and publication.

In the first session, MEL expert Mimoza Agolli elaborated on the stages of data collection, emphasizing the importance of defining the tools used for planning and structuring the data collection process. She also discussed the types of measurements applied and the selection of sampling methods for studies. Regarding sampling, Agolli explained that it can be either random or purposeful. Random (or probability) sampling is primarily used for quantitative research and monitoring. Purposeful sampling is more suitable for qualitative studies, where selection criteria are determined based on certain shared characteristics. Agolli emphasized the importance of research ethics, ensuring that throughout this process, scientific research standards are upheld, and personal data protection is guaranteed.

In the second session, Agolli focused on the methods of data collection and analysis, distinguishing between quantitative and qualitative data. She also clarified that monitoring methods differ from those used for the evaluation of public policies. For monitoring, data collection tools may include in-depth interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups. For qualitative monitoring, methods such as observations, SWOT analysis, and case studies can be used. During the evaluation phase, data is used to compare before-and-after situations.

 In the third session, the discussion focused on the learning aspect linked to monitoring and evaluation. This element is combined with reporting, publishing, and communicating findings and results obtained during the monitoring and evaluation process. According to Agolli, this phase is crucial because it ensures the transparency and dissemination of MEL findings, followed by the formulation of policy or project recommendations based on the monitoring process. These recommendations serve as lessons learned for further improvements, adjustments, and more effective implementation of policy objectives.

The final session was dedicated to practical examples and case studies on data collection and analysis methods for both monitoring and evaluation. Participants, divided into groups, engaged in hands-on exercises to define sampling methods, variables, and appropriate methodologies for monitoring or evaluating public policy cases in Albania, such as judicial reform, anti-corruption initiatives, or vocational employment programs.